Outside intelligence
What can be learned before anyone touches your systems?
Physical. Human. Cyber.
If a capable adversary started outside your building, how far would they get?
VoraxSec runs authorized adversary simulation for leadership teams that need evidence, not comfort. We test the route from public intelligence and physical access to social engineering, cyber entry and executive reporting.
Written authorization
Controlled operations
Executive evidence
The signal
Most tests begin after the adversary already won the first move.
Network scope is useful. It is not the same as organizational resilience. VoraxSec connects the parts that are usually tested in isolation, so leadership can see the actual path from exposure to consequence.
Open source signals
Human trust
Physical opportunity
Cyber impact
Board decision
Risk layers
Where assumptions become exposure.
Human process
Which habits, assumptions and vendor flows create trust too quickly?
Physical access
Where do badges, doors, reception routines and facilities controls become cyber risk?
Executive evidence
What should leadership fix first, and what does the residual risk mean?
Operating model
Four views. One adversary path.
Use the tabs to see how a realistic campaign moves from intelligence to impact while staying authorized, controlled and measurable.
01
Map the exposure before the operation begins.
We examine public signals, people, facilities, vendors and external systems to understand how a capable adversary would select the easiest route in.
- OSINT and external footprint review
- Executive and role based exposure mapping
- Likely trust paths and pretext opportunities
02
Test the moment where human trust becomes access.
Authorized physical and social scenarios reveal how real decisions are made under ordinary pressure, not how they appear in policy.
- Reception and visitor process testing
- Physical access control validation
- Social engineering resilience exercises
03
Move only inside the rules of engagement.
Cyber activity is objective based and bounded by written authorization, safety conditions, evidence handling and clear stop points.
- Controlled post access validation
- Detection and response measurement
- Evidence that technical teams can reproduce and fix
04
Translate the campaign into decisions.
The final output is written for action: what failed, why it matters, which controls reduce real risk and what leadership should sponsor next.
- Executive narrative and technical appendix
- Prioritized remediation path
- Residual risk view for governance and budget
See it in action
What a full scope operation looks like.
From intelligence gathering to physical breach, device implantation, and total network compromise. This is an authorized simulation, reconstructed for demonstration purposes.
Engagements
Focused formats for serious organizations.
Each engagement is scoped to answer a concrete leadership question, with enough technical depth for remediation and enough clarity for governance.
Executive exposure assessment
A concise leadership exercise connecting public information, physical context and business risk.
Physical cyber simulation
A full scope operation that begins outside the perimeter and measures how far an authorized team can progress.
Social engineering resilience
Scenario based testing of decision points, escalation behavior and verification habits.
Board briefing
A plain language report that turns evidence into accountable priorities.
Authorization
Offensive work requires restraint.
Every engagement is written, authorized and bounded before work begins. Scope, safety limits, evidence handling, legal contacts and emergency stops are defined up front. The goal is not embarrassment. The goal is a credible picture of how the organization behaves under pressure.
Confidential briefing
Start with one question: what would we learn if the test began outside the network?
For sensitive inquiries, use direct email. Initial conversations are discreet and scoped before any operational detail is discussed.
yaniv.f@voraxsec.com LinkedIn company page